In which poor judgment is catching?
Nov. 14th, 2013 09:47 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
...okay, so, in episode 3, a girl gets fired because she happened to be exploited as part of a con. In episode four, Peter decides that it's be perfectly acceptable to con a new employee at a place whose boss seems to be... extremely unforgiving. Because expediency is king, I guess?
In episode 4, Neal shows up at the Burkes' house drugged out of his head on an experimental mind-altering substance that Mozzie handed him. (Peter does not think that decision was wise.) In episode 5, Peter seems to have no problems downing some kind of experimental alternative pharmaceutical that Mozzie hands to him.
I... these are not narrative or practical decisions I would have made. Though I eagerly await next week to see if there's a pattern.
In other news, I keep typoing "Peter" as "Pater", which seems apt.
In episode 4, Neal shows up at the Burkes' house drugged out of his head on an experimental mind-altering substance that Mozzie handed him. (Peter does not think that decision was wise.) In episode 5, Peter seems to have no problems downing some kind of experimental alternative pharmaceutical that Mozzie hands to him.
I... these are not narrative or practical decisions I would have made. Though I eagerly await next week to see if there's a pattern.
In other news, I keep typoing "Peter" as "Pater", which seems apt.
no subject
Date: 2013-12-11 03:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-12-13 07:07 pm (UTC)But then, White Collar seems designed to frustrate me by giving me delicious layers of moral complexity and then ignoring those and cooking up something fun and lighthearted. *frustrated grabhands*
no subject
Date: 2013-12-13 07:17 pm (UTC)