Denise (
synecdochic of this parish) has been moved to provide a long, LONG and fascinating Bsky thread providing an inside-baseball exegesis of the new Pope's first sermon and why, she argues, it represents Shots Fired in relation to significant portions of American Catholicism.
It is deep geeky fun regardless of your personal beliefs (and maybe especially for those of us who are outside Pope fandom and want to know what's going on).
Start here:
https://bsky.app/profile/rahaeli.bsky.social/post/3loqsfhswjk2rOr:
https://bsky.app/profile/rahaeli.bsky.social/post/3lorjh7mrzs2d (links if Bsky is making it hard to just keep clicking through on "continue thread")
Important contextual N.B.:
The Pope is Catholic. You do not get to be pope unless you are operating broadly within the current framework of Catholic orthodoxy.
I personally am an atheist! I believe it is fine to be an atheist, and that atheists are capable of just as much moral goodness!
HOWEVER. THE POPE IS CATHOLIC.
Thus it is not a big surprise that he is going to maintain that Christianity is the right and proper religion and the source of moral goodness. I seem to recall it's been something of a shift in doctrine to acknowledge that non-Christians (who have heard of Christianity and thus cannot be excused on grounds of ignorance)
might be saved.
But the idea that Christianity is still the superior religion to which ideally everyone would be brought -- that is kind of baked in to the whole Catholic Church deal. If you are in fact fully committed to recognizing all religious traditions as of equal value, you miiiight get to be a very radical priest, but you are definitely not going to progress within the hierarchy to the point of being Pope.
So I am not expecting
the fucking Pope to come out and say "actually being an atheist is just as good as being Christian." I am approaching this with the assumption that he is going to be working within the current doctrine of the Catholic Church. Because, again,
Pope.
And it's all sorts of interesting to look at where he is situated within that doctrinal framework, and speculate about in what directions he might develop it or how he is using it to make particular points. But the framework comes as a given.
So when Pope Bob preaches that certain Christians are "living in a state of practical atheism" -- the interesting takeaway, to me, is not "oh noez the Pope is referring to atheism like it's a bad thing," it's "what groups of Christians is he potentially referring to and chastising here."
Also:
Strickland. The reveal that Pope Bob played a key role in the decision to remove him is when I went "oh shiiiiiiit, no wonder the tradcaths hate him and the MAGA-ites have decided that he's a
WOKE MARXIST POPE."
Basically, if they wanted to pick a Pope as the most crushing rebuke possible to J. D. Vance specifically, this is the guy they'd pick.